Re: A new and better FBS thread
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
You're right, but yet the media networks seem to keep biting on the market concept again and again.
CUSA added Sammy and Kennesaw (Atlanta) over some others that would have had bigger fanbases. Kennesaw is somewhere around #5 or #6 in Atlanta, and has a tiny following. Georgia St (also Atlanta) doesn't put many butts in seats, yet are mentioned as a potential AAC backfill.
AAC added schools like Charlotte and UNT also based on "market" over some other possibilities like App St and Marshall in the last reshuffle.
B1G adding UCLA was sort of a "market" add also, not that impressive outside of location in football. Oregon St beat them, and was more competitive in PAC, but got left behind. Looked like more butts in seats the games I watched also.
Its dang near crazy, yet the behavior pattern has persisted across all levels of FBS, largely based on location/market DMAs.
I think one thing that people have mistaken, though, is that media markets only matter if you’re strong enough to get on local network TV in your own market. It’s abundant if you’re a P4 school but G6 and below it’s non-existent.
I’m not sure the conferences that have taken them would consider SHSU, FAU, FIU, etc. to be a raging success. Compare that to the GSU, App, JMU, coastal Carolina additions that the sun belt has made that brought them back from the brink.
That’s the path to success as a G5 conference.
Mountain West, hope for the best.